Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

A critiquer's role

Thanks for all the feedback on how people see their role as a critiquer.


I’d say there’s near universal agreement on the main issues. 

Find out what kind of feedback/criticism is wanted.


Everyone seems to tailor their critique to the perceived skill level of the individual concerned, but the areas covered were everything from basic grammar to overall plot and continuity.


  While no one believes in pulling their punches (if someone wants a cheerleader, they shouldn’t ask for a critique), the goal is to provide constructive feedback eg: ‘In my opinion, this bit doesn’t work because… and here’s how I think it can be fixed.’


Don’t be a snitty-snoot pants ie: critique the writing, respect the writer.


Be an encourager.


Be honest in our feedback, but tactful.


Point out the bad stuff, but find something to praise too. 

Not surprisingly, people seem to have little time for Prima Donnas, or those who pick faults for the sake of it.

I’d like to add a couple of other suggestions.


Assuming the goal of the writer is to get published, give feedback on the title, opening sentence/paragraph and that all-important first page.


From what I understand, slush readers often make a ‘no’ decision without ever getting to the second page of an ms. Even in these days of e-submissions, I think the metaphorical logic still applies. 


If that’s the case, I think it’s helpful to give feedback on the story title (a bad one might not hurt, but I imagine a good one helps). Did the opening sentence grab you by the eye-balls, or was it a long non-active description?   How about that first page? When you reached the bottom, did you know what was going on? Did you care?


Then there’s the ending. Did it bring a smile to your face? Did you feel satisfied?


Of course, all these opinions are subjective, but I think that sort of feedback can really help too.

How about you?  Do you give specific feedback on the title/opening line/first page/ story ending?

Is there anything not covered above?

Site Meter


( 8 comments — Leave a comment )
Jun. 29th, 2009 11:05 pm (UTC)
Jun. 29th, 2009 11:19 pm (UTC)
Great link, thanks for sharing. And I've always felt Dale Carnegie's book should be taught in schools:)
Jun. 30th, 2009 12:15 am (UTC)
I think all those (opening, ending, title, first page) end up being part of the critique. I especially agree with saying what someone is doing right and not always harping on what is wrong.

Straight From Hel (http://straightfromhel.blogspot.com)
Jun. 30th, 2009 12:03 pm (UTC)
I guess what I'm trying to say is that I put on my slush-reader's hat (or at least, what I imagine is a slush reader's hat) for those specific sections :)
Jun. 30th, 2009 07:01 am (UTC)
A fine summary of what's needed :)
Jun. 30th, 2009 12:04 pm (UTC)
Thanks. I'm relieved to find that I've been more or less doing it right :)
Jun. 30th, 2009 07:25 am (UTC)
Oh yeah. Always on opening line, first paragraph, first page, story ending. Sometimes on the transition from one chapter to the next. LOL In the heat of the moment, I forgot all about mentioning "hook."

The feel has to be way, waaaaay off before I advise on title. To me, the title is the most subjective thing of all.
Jun. 30th, 2009 12:07 pm (UTC)
You're right about the title, of course, but I think it helps to have feedback. Like anything else in a critique, if a bunch of people mention that the title put them off, or left them disappointed when the story itself didn't seem to go with the title, it might be something that needs looking at.
( 8 comments — Leave a comment )

Things What I Wrote and Other Stuff

No longer in print but there are still some copies floating around out there

No longer in print but there are still some copies floating around out there



Books by my writer friends - compressed

NJ Writing groups - compressed

NJ writing conference - compressed


Latest Month

August 2019
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Paulina Bozek