January 12th, 2009

Back to the Grindstone

Back in December, I finished the rough draft of Waking up Jack Thunder, a contemporary sci-fi thriller about a shy scientist who ends up sharing his brain with a bad-tempered secret agent.  I set it aside for a month so that I could read it through with fresh eyes. 

Over the last few weeks, I've been focused on organizing the website and Yahoo group for The New Jersey Authors' Network, an idea I had to help writers get together to sell their books at multi-author events throughout the Garden State.  More on that another time, right now it's time to get back to writing.

When not working on the Network, I spent some time sifting through my 'ideas folder' to choose my next novel - decided to write a regular thriller, Dobson's Choice.  While I work on the outline, I also need to keep pitching my first novel, Fur-Face (YA urban fantasy, currently pitched to Firebrand lit - courtesy of a headsup from my friend, Neal, dqg_neal ),  do some revision on A Union of Snakes (medieval sci-fi), and of course, do the rewrites for Jack Thunder

 I can't wait to get started :)


To be or not to be... self-published

Nick Kaufmann gave a mention to the NJ Authors' Network on his blog the other day.  I was a little surprised at the reaction to the fact that self-published authors are welcome to join. 

For what it's worth, here's my personal take on why some 'regular-published' authors seem to look down on (and in some cases resent), the self-published, and why some self-published authors find this a hot-button issue. 

I believe many 'regular' authors see the progression from writer to published author is a rite of passage (no pun intended); a sort of club if you will.  You could meet an author from almost anywhere in the world and immediately have a common bond, because let's face it, unless you were famous for something else first, you probably both had to overcome the same kind of obstacles eg: finding an agent/publisher etc.

If you look at it from their point of view, doing it yourself is a form of cheating.  After all, anyone with enough money can publish anything, regardless of quality.  A bit like a war veteran seeing someone wear a medal ribbon bought from a pawn shop.

Self-published authors on the other hand, would probably have loved to have got an agent and a contract from Scholastic or the like.  I can't know for certain, but I imagine they at least tried to go through the 'regular' process before deciding to pay out a few thousand dollars to see their work in print.  I think that, deep down, even the best writers who choose this path have a small inner-critic that questions whether their work is good enough to have made it into print otherwise (regardless of the compelling reasons that made self-publishing such an attractive proposition at the time).

I'm not saying self-publishing's a good or bad thing.  In truth, it's not a route I would choose to take, and I do think there's a better quality of editing done by regular publishers, but I believe it depends entirely on your long term career goals as a writer. 

Isn't this the true test of any published book:  Would the person who reads it, recommend it to a friend and/or purchase another by the same author?  If the answer is 'yes', then who cares how it's published?

Then again, what do I know?


Wii Fit update

Just took a half-hour break and got out Wii Fit balance board.  Burned a few calories  (only another few million to go), but more importantly, I  took back the ski-jump title from my son.

Hehe.  335 yards, beat that, kid!