The other day, my friend,
amy34, posted an entry about some of the unpleasant reactions she got from people after they asked her for (and received) honest critiques of their work.
No matter how many times it happens, I’m still surprised when I hear about someone getting upset by feedback from his/her fellow writers.
We’ve all had our share of unpleasantness resulting from both verbal and written critiques we’ve given.
It got me thinking. Maybe we ought to have a universal charter that people should read before submitting their work for feedback.
It would go something like this:
The Critiquee’s Charter 
1. As the person submitting my work for critique, I understand that people have taken time away from doing other things to provide me with feedback, something which will undoubtedly help me more than it will them. Though I may feel upset by their comments, and may not agree with their observations, or decide not to implement the changes they recommend, I will keep that to myself. I will remember that I am grateful, and take the time to thank them for their input.
2. I recognize that not everyone has the same critique style. Therefore, unless we’ve agreed on a specific method beforehand, I will accept feedback in whatever form the critiquer cares to provide it.
3. I want people’s honest opinions. If they give them in a way that upsets me, I will recognize that one person’s ‘rude git’ is another person’s ‘straight-talker’, and re-read item #1 until I feel better.
4. If all I want is applause and a pat on the back for a job well done, I will not waste my critiquers’ time asking for feedback. If I do, I understand that it serves me bloody well right if I don’t get the glowing praise I expected. 
5. If I think the critiquer just didn’t ‘get it’, I will re-read #1 until the urge to say so has passed.
6. If I think the critiquer doesn’t know what he/she is talking about, I will re-read #1 until the urge to say so has passed.
7. If I want to disagree with a critique, I will re-read #1 until the urge to do so has passed.
8. If several people make similar observations, I will at least consider the possibility that, despite my undoubted genius, I may have missed something important.
9. If someone gives me a harsh critique, I promise to remember that I am (in years at least) a grown-up, and will resist any temptation to ‘repay’ them when I review their work. 
10. I understand that some people actually set out to critique in a spiteful, hurtful, manner. They like to show off at the expense of others, and have little or no interest in helping anyone improve their work. On those rare occasions when I come across such a person, I will remind myself that idiots like this are the exception rather than the rule. I will learn to recognize and ignore him/her, and remember that (as a certain old gran used to say), ‘It’s better to be upset by people like that, than to be people like that.’ 
11. At all times, I will try to remember that critiques are just opinions, which, like spouses and children can be embraced or ignored however one sees fit.
12. ________________________________________
I left #12 blank. What would you put in there?
Has someone you critiqued ever got upset at you?
- Mood:
determined

Comments
Will ponder on #12.....
I ran a workshop at a local convention for four years. In all that time, I had one nasty, disgruntled participant. Everyone else, even though most were new writers and new to being critiqued, was extremely gracious.
This year was the first I didn't run the workshop. The coordinator reported that she had one disgruntled participant. I'd love to know if it's the same person, who decided to try again now that I wasn't running the show. But I don't think it would be appropriate to ask the coordinator who her disgruntled participant was. ;-)
You're stronger willed than me. I'd have asked right away.
So is being one-up on the 'Always wanted to write a book' crowd ;)
Edited at 2009-07-22 05:07 pm (UTC)
My friend, Cherry Weiner (not someone you'd ever describe as a shrinking violet), says, 'Unless you plan on going around to explain things to everyone who buys your book, you better make it clear in the ms.'
12. I will leave all weapons at home before setting out for my critique group.
12. Treat others as you would like to be treated?
Worst reaction I ever got to a crit? After crittering the first longwinded chapter of a historical romance for someone who specifically asked ME for a crit, (and was one of those people who just wanted me to tell her how great she was) I was told, "You're not a real writer anyway. You're just someone who writes."
Worst crit I ever got? Honestly--the one I remember most is the woman who could find nothing to correct in my story who instead told me, "The name of you POV character is terrible. It totally ruins the story."
Um...yeah.
(But I'm lucky, I belong to an excellent critique group.)
I liked the other point you made in your post about why published authors would agree to do critiques. Especially since so many people have thinner skin than they imagine. Still, for those of us who are prepared to accept criticism, I'm glad they do.
Heh, instead of a prayer at the start, should we all recite # 1?
I hope she gives you kind comments and good advice :)
Thanks for sharing :)
I pointed out that I was not mean. I was firm in my opinions. I looked at her work as I would any other story in my slush pile. Her manuscript was too junior to have been submitted. The point of the workshop was to see what professionals thought of the manuscript.
She did not like my answer. Too bad, really. The story concept was a good one.
I didn't think anyone was mean, but boy did they tear it apart (and I have to say, quite rightly so). I made copious, tear-stained notes throughout and tried my best to fix the problems they pointed out. I reworked it and tried it again at this year's conference. I'm proud to say that, though it wasn't considered perfect by any means, it got a lot of praise, to the extent that two of the panel even referred back to it in a positive way while critiquing others.
Ironically, I was expecting the worst this year, whereas in '08, I was naive enough to think I'd written a great opening page.
I guess the moral is, don't ask for a critique if you can't handle an honest response, right?
I don't know if anyone's gotten upset at my critiques or not, though I always try to find at least one good thing to say.
I agree with finding something good to say too. A sincere compliment can help take the sting out of a criticism :)
And for a number twelve:
I will work on my next story/novel/chapter in order to have a new "love" before going back to visit the old one. And hopefully this will help me look at the work with fresh eyes. "
These are great (just like someone's old gran, I'm suspecting).
I can only remember one person getting bent out of shape about the first--and only--crit I gave him when he joined this online group I used to belong to. He went off about how I should be more careful about how I word things because I was going to discourage some poor beginning writer and make them give up by offering such harsh, soul-crushing crits. That came as a bit of a surprise to me since a) my crit began with me pointing out several things that I thought were good in his story, and b) my crit ended with me reiterating the good points and wishing him good luck with the story.
The real WTF-inducing part of his response was when he defensively said something along the lines of, "And a lot of what you pointed out is just your opinion, not fact." *head desk*
Yes, people have gotten upset with me, because I'll point out grammatical errors, which, according to a lot of writers 'don't count'. Nor, apparently, does spelling, capitalization, or punctuation. No, we're just supposed to tell them their idea is awesome. The irony is I'm a horrible speller, but I'll take the time to look something up if Word won't auto-correct it properly, and I don't have much patience for people who 'don't have the time' for that.
So I think my #12 would be: grammar does count. Proofread accordingly before posting.
Thanks for sharing :)